+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Fayette County, Ohio
    Posts
    5,827

    Default Recommended change

    With the proliferation of Parrot posts, that is a user copying an earlier post and inserting their spam in their signatures, I think that the inclusion on URl's in the signature line should be prohibited.
    Jack
    Be sure you live your life, because you are a long time dead.-Scottish Proverb

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Posts
    2,969

    Default Re: Recommended change

    Or you have to have a certain number of postings before the URLs can be shown.

    I think its a good thing for DIYers to have access to my web site so they can see examples, and get some assurance I actually know what I'm talking about. You know, those warm and fuzzy feelings.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    nova scotia, canada
    Posts
    1,522

    Default Re: Recommended change

    i agree with jacks idea. banning all url's can be a bad thing in signatures. what if some members are certified contractors and are doing wonders for giving info for other posters, they should be allowed to show their companys site off
    fire up the saw and make some dust

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •